What Happens At The Corporate Retreat Stays At The Corporate Retreat
Notes to my (legal) self.
Notes to my (legal) self.
Lawyers, like everyone else, sometimes do not take the same ownership over cases that might not be their own.
As the use of artificial intelligence permeates legal practice, a critical question confronts every legal professional who uses these tools: Can I trust this?
Lawyers are always expected to be credible and reliable sources of information.
Can you, an associate or employee, contribute to a workplace 'culture of trust'?
And reliability may not be everything -- but it's also way ahead of whatever's in second place.
Clients are not the only audience whose trust litigators must win, as columnist Gaston Kroub explains.
Legal teams ask a practical question. If large language models are so capable, why does legal AI still depend on curated content, and why does surfacing that content matter so much?
Does reputation matter? You bet it does. In-house columnist Mark Herrmann explains why.
Should the billable hour really be vilified as something that rewards inefficiency and incompetence, or is it a benchmark with which to judge performance, or is it both?
Lawyers are ranked on par with prostitutes when it comes to trust. Lovely.
I have two memos sitting unread in my inbox. One of the memos is great; the other one is terrible. I know which is which. And, as I said, I haven't yet read either one of them. Isn't trust terribly unfair?
Put away the guesswork—Lexis® Verdict & Settlement Analyzer helps legal professionals assess case potential with confidence by using data-driven insights from the industry’s largest collection of verdicts and settlements.
What did you do yesterday? I’m assuming you went to work. Did you put in a full day? Great. Let’s assume you got started around 9:00, took about an hour for lunch, and signed off at 7:00. Maybe for you that’s a light day, or maybe that’s a long day. Doesn’t matter. So that means […]